Tuesday, May 29, 2018

Mid-Morning Market Update: Markets Open Lower; Booz Allen Hamilton Profit Beats Estimates

Following the market opening Tuesday, the Dow traded down 0.70 percent to 24,579.22 while the NASDAQ declined 0.30 percent to 7,411.42. The S&P also fell, dropping 0.67 percent to 2,703.19.

Leading and Lagging Sectors

Tuesday morning, the consumer staples shares surged 0.17 percent. Meanwhile, top gainers in the sector included CV Sciences, Inc. (OTC: CVSI), up 6 percent, and Sanderson Farms, Inc. (NASDAQ: SAFM) up 5 percent.

In trading on Tuesday, financial shares fell 1.47 percent.

Top Headline

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (NYSE: BAH) reported better-than-expected earnings for its fourth quarter.

Booz Allen posted adjusted earnings of $0.52 per share on revenue of $1.64 billion. However, analysts were expecting earnings of $0.46 per share on revenue of $1.67 billion.

Booz Allen Hamilton expects FY19 adjusted earnings of $2.35 to $2.50 per share on sales growth of 6 percent to 8 percent.

 

Equities Trading UP

Jupai Holdings Limited (NYSE: JP) shares shot up 16 percent to $26.48 after reporting Q1 results.

Shares of American Woodmark Corporation (NASDAQ: AMWD) got a boost, shooting up 13 percent to $100.05 after the company reported upbeat Q4 results.

Evolus, Inc. (NASDAQ: EOLS) shares were also up, gaining 19 percent to $26.67. Evolus named Lauren Silvernail as Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President, Corporate Development.

Equities Trading DOWN

Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. (NYSE: RRTS) shares dropped 14 percent to $1.9025. Office Depot, Inc. (NASDAQ: ODP) will replace Roadrunner Transportation Systems in the S&P SmallCap 600 on Monday, June 4.

Shares of T2 Biosystems, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTOO) were down 10 percent to $8.00 after the health care company that targets unmet needs received clearance from the FDA. The company said the FDA granted a market clearance for its T2Bacteria Panel for the direct detection of bacterial species in human whole blood specimens from patients with suspected bloodstream infections.

Fibrocell Science, Inc. (NASDAQ: FCSC) was down, falling around 13 percent to $2.51. Fibrocell reported a $6.0 million registered direct offering priced at-the-market

Commodities

In commodity news, oil traded down 0.97 percent to $67.22 while gold traded down 0.57 percent to $1,301.60.

Silver traded down 1.12 percent Tuesday to $16.36, while copper rose 0.45 to $3.0915.

Eurozone

European shares were lower today. The eurozone’s STOXX 600 tumbled 1.20 percent, the Spanish Ibex Index fell 2.48 percent, while Italy’s FTSE MIB Index declined 2.44 percent. Meanwhile the German DAX dipped 1.23 percent, and the French CAC 40 slipped 1.11 percent while U.K. shares fell 1.17 percent.

Economics

The S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller home price index increased 6.8 percent year-over-year for March.

The Conference Board’s consumer confidence index climbed to 128 in May, versus a revised reading of 125.6 in April.

The Dallas Fed manufacturing index for May is schedule for release at 10:30 a.m. ET.

The Treasury is set to auction 3-and 6-month bills at 11:30 a.m. ET.

The Treasury will auction 4-week bills at 1:00 p.m. ET.

Monday, May 28, 2018

$317.10 Million in Sales Expected for Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (DLB) This Quarter

Wall Street analysts predict that Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (NYSE:DLB) will report $317.10 million in sales for the current fiscal quarter, Zacks reports. Five analysts have provided estimates for Dolby Laboratories’ earnings, with the highest sales estimate coming in at $319.62 million and the lowest estimate coming in at $314.31 million. Dolby Laboratories posted sales of $305.67 million during the same quarter last year, which would indicate a positive year over year growth rate of 3.7%. The business is expected to announce its next quarterly earnings results on Tuesday, July 24th.

On average, analysts expect that Dolby Laboratories will report full-year sales of $1.18 billion for the current fiscal year. For the next fiscal year, analysts expect that the firm will report sales of $1.26 billion per share, with estimates ranging from $1.23 billion to $1.27 billion. Zacks’ sales calculations are a mean average based on a survey of sell-side research firms that follow Dolby Laboratories.

Get Dolby Laboratories alerts:

Dolby Laboratories (NYSE:DLB) last announced its quarterly earnings data on Tuesday, April 24th. The electronics maker reported $0.78 earnings per share (EPS) for the quarter, beating analysts’ consensus estimates of $0.64 by $0.14. Dolby Laboratories had a net margin of 7.64% and a return on equity of 12.73%. The business had revenue of $301.36 million during the quarter, compared to analyst estimates of $300.37 million. During the same period last year, the firm posted $0.63 EPS. The company’s revenue was up 12.7% on a year-over-year basis.

A number of brokerages have issued reports on DLB. Zacks Investment Research raised shares of Dolby Laboratories from a “hold” rating to a “buy” rating and set a $73.00 price objective for the company in a report on Wednesday, March 28th. Barrington Research reaffirmed a “buy” rating and set a $78.00 price objective on shares of Dolby Laboratories in a report on Tuesday, May 1st. Finally, ValuEngine raised shares of Dolby Laboratories from a “hold” rating to a “buy” rating in a report on Thursday, March 1st. One analyst has rated the stock with a sell rating, four have given a hold rating and three have given a buy rating to the company’s stock. The stock presently has a consensus rating of “Hold” and a consensus target price of $66.50.

In other Dolby Laboratories news, EVP Mark Andrew Sherman sold 10,000 shares of Dolby Laboratories stock in a transaction on Monday, February 26th. The shares were sold at an average price of $65.00, for a total transaction of $650,000.00. The transaction was disclosed in a document filed with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which is available through this hyperlink. Also, major shareholder Dagmar Dolby sold 100,000 shares of Dolby Laboratories stock in a transaction on Wednesday, May 2nd. The stock was sold at an average price of $60.81, for a total transaction of $6,081,000.00. The disclosure for this sale can be found here. Over the last three months, insiders sold 1,153,948 shares of company stock valued at $71,420,638. 43.80% of the stock is currently owned by insiders.

A number of hedge funds and other institutional investors have recently bought and sold shares of the business. D.A. Davidson & CO. boosted its stake in Dolby Laboratories by 3.8% during the first quarter. D.A. Davidson & CO. now owns 25,802 shares of the electronics maker’s stock worth $1,640,000 after buying an additional 952 shares during the period. US Bancorp DE boosted its stake in Dolby Laboratories by 33.4% during the fourth quarter. US Bancorp DE now owns 3,852 shares of the electronics maker’s stock worth $239,000 after buying an additional 964 shares during the period. Hermes Investment Management Ltd. boosted its stake in Dolby Laboratories by 6.2% during the fourth quarter. Hermes Investment Management Ltd. now owns 17,201 shares of the electronics maker’s stock worth $1,066,000 after buying an additional 1,000 shares during the period. Zurcher Kantonalbank Zurich Cantonalbank lifted its position in shares of Dolby Laboratories by 48.9% during the fourth quarter. Zurcher Kantonalbank Zurich Cantonalbank now owns 3,472 shares of the electronics maker’s stock worth $215,000 after purchasing an additional 1,141 shares during the last quarter. Finally, The Manufacturers Life Insurance Company lifted its position in shares of Dolby Laboratories by 29.2% during the first quarter. The Manufacturers Life Insurance Company now owns 5,219 shares of the electronics maker’s stock worth $332,000 after purchasing an additional 1,181 shares during the last quarter. 53.73% of the stock is owned by institutional investors.

DLB traded down $0.13 during trading on Tuesday, reaching $61.44. 256,820 shares of the company traded hands, compared to its average volume of 364,479. Dolby Laboratories has a 12-month low of $48.00 and a 12-month high of $74.29. The firm has a market cap of $6.40 billion, a P/E ratio of 24.00, a price-to-earnings-growth ratio of 2.22 and a beta of 0.76.

The firm also recently announced a quarterly dividend, which was paid on Wednesday, May 16th. Investors of record on Monday, May 7th were issued a $0.16 dividend. This represents a $0.64 dividend on an annualized basis and a dividend yield of 1.04%. The ex-dividend date of this dividend was Friday, May 4th. Dolby Laboratories’s dividend payout ratio (DPR) is presently 29.09%.

About Dolby Laboratories

Dolby Laboratories, Inc creates audio and imaging technologies that transform entertainment and communications at the cinema, at home, at work, and on mobile devices. The company develops and licenses its audio technologies, including Dolby Digital Plus for digital television, mobile, and Internet-based services; Dolby Digital, a digital audio coding technology that provides multichannel sound in the home; and AAC & HE-AAC, an audio coding technologies used to broadcast, download, and streaming content.

Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on Dolby Laboratories (DLB)

For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

Earnings History and Estimates for Dolby Laboratories (NYSE:DLB)

Tuesday, May 22, 2018

Calling For A Blue-Ribbon Panel On The Retirement Crisis

&l;img class=&q;size-full wp-image-17739&q; src=&q;http://blogs-images.forbes.com/nextavenue/files/2018/05/Congress-May-Create-a-Retirement-Crisis-Blue-Ribbon-Panel-750x499.jpg?width=960&q; alt=&q;&q; data-height=&q;499&q; data-width=&q;750&q;&g;

Remember Studebakers? In 1963, their troubled automaker shut down its U.S. operations and more than 4,000 workers lost some or all of their promised pensions. Thousands of workers elsewhere found themselves in similar straits when their firms walked away from underfunded pensions. President Kennedy created a blue-chip commission to figure out how to prop up the pension system. And a decade later, President Ford signed into law the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, federally insuring private pension plans and regulating pensions and most employee benefits.

&l;strong&g;Time for a Retirement Crisis Commission?&l;/strong&g;

That was the last time Congress negotiated a broad-based overhaul of the private sector&a;rsquo;s retirement rules. Some policymakers think it&a;rsquo;s again time for a blue-ribbon retirement panel &a;mdash; this time, looking at how to boost retirement security in America. Call it the Retirement Crisis Commission.

Senators Todd Young (R-Ind.) and Cory Booker (D-N.J.) are the sponsors of the bipartisan legislation. They&a;rsquo;re calling for the formation of a federal retirement commission with a mandate to design ways to improve private sector retirement security. The conservative and progressive senators joined forces to draw up the initiative following the recommendation in a sobering 2017 Government Accountability Office report on the retirement system.

&l;strong&g;Also on Forbes:&l;/strong&g;

&a;ldquo;My hope is that the commission would deliver to Congress some ideas that are bold and ambitious,&a;rdquo; says Young. &a;ldquo;It has been 40 years since Congress has looked at private retirement security in a comprehensive manner. In the intervening decades the economy has been transformed.&a;rdquo;

I hope his peers listen and the blue-ribbon panel gets greenlit.

&l;strong&g;America&s;s Retirement System: Complex and Byzantine&l;/strong&g;

A federal commission would at least open up the prospect that Congress might help modernize a system that has evolved (devolved, really) into an overly complex, byzantine and woefully inadequate safety net for America&a;rsquo;s retirees.

&a;ldquo;We now have a huge, huge mess,&a;rdquo; says Eugene Steuerle, senior fellow at the Urban Institute, a Washington, D.C. think tank. &a;ldquo;The big issue for me is the retirement system doesn&a;rsquo;t do what it&a;rsquo;s supposed to do &a;mdash; protect people. In that sense, it&a;rsquo;s a failure.&a;rdquo;

The biggest failing? About 40% of full-time private-sector employees lack access to an employer-sponsored retirement savings plan. They typically work at small-to medium-sized businesses. The main reason small business owners say they don&a;rsquo;t offer a retirement savings option is the expense of setting up and managing the plans, according to a 2017 Pew survey.

&l;!--donotpaginate--&g;

Contingent workers &a;mdash; think freelancers, independent contractors and gig economy workers &a;mdash; also can&a;rsquo;t participate in an employer-sponsored retirement plan because they&a;rsquo;re not employees. The same holds for most part-time workers.

Even people who can sign up a 401(k) retirement plan at work often find it hard to save and manage their portfolio. That helps explain the dismal figures you&a;rsquo;ve no doubt seen on how little so many workers have in retirement savings.

&l;strong&g;From Employers&s; Risk to Yours&l;/strong&g;

Over the past four decades, companies have moved away from traditional pensions where employers bear the investment risk and commit to a fixed payout of money, typically based on a salary and years-of-service formula. With those plans, employees get a steady pension income &a;mdash; essentially a monthly paycheck &a;mdash; during their retirement years.

Some members of the leading edge of the boomer generation have this kind of pension in retirement or will (although the size of their benefits may have been frozen some years back). &a;nbsp;But most younger boomers, Gen Xers and millennials only know about pensions from history books or tales from earlier generations in their families.

These days, of course, companies that offer retirement plans have shifted to defined contribution retirement savings plans such as 401(k)s. Here, employees absorb all the responsibility and risk of saving for retirement. They decide how much to invest (within regulatory limits) and where to invest (within the menu of choices in the plan).

&l;strong&g;The Crumbling Pillars of Retirement&l;/strong&g;

Trouble is, as behavioral economists have documented, most of us are bad at saving and investing regularly and for the long haul. And we&a;rsquo;re getting worse. Personal savings rates are about half what they were the 1970s and 1980s.

Not only do half of private-sector workers fail to participate in retirement savings plans (adding together those without the option and those who don&a;rsquo;t join). Worse, about a quarter of plan participants borrow or withdraw from their retirement savings; many don&a;rsquo;t put the money back.

And did I mention that the Social Security trust fund is expected to be unable to fully pay promised benefits 16 years from now, in 2034?

&l;!--donotpaginate--&g;

Taken altogether, the three pillars of America&a;rsquo;s retirement savings system are crumbling &a;mdash; employer pensions or retirement savings; personal savings and Social Security.

&l;strong&g;How the Blue-Ribbon Panel Would Work&l;/strong&g;

That brings me back to the blue-ribbon commission. It would include the U.S. Secretaries of Labor, Treasury and Commerce; two presidential appointments; six appointees from the U.S. Senate and six from the U.S. House of Representatives. They would focus on the private sector (Social Security might be a panel for another day).

Young told me he wants the experts to think big. They should consider retirement issues facing the mobile workforce, gig economy workers and part-time employees, he says. Young wants the panel to explore what kinds of nudges, incentives and other insights from behavioral economists might encourage Americans to save more for retirement.

The commission would explore policies to emulate from other countries, such as the mandatory retirement savings systems of Australia and several Scandinavian nations. &a;ldquo;I&a;rsquo;ve read about some of the reforms to government programs in the Nordic countries which are more innovative than people are aware of,&a;rdquo; Young says.

&l;strong&g;Many Worthy Ideas to Consider&l;/strong&g;

There&a;rsquo;s no shortage of good ideas for the panel to review.

For instance, the &a;ldquo;auto-IRA proposal&a;rdquo; by J. Mark Iwry of the Brookings Institution and David John of AARP would make savings more automatic and accessible for the millions of workers not covered by employer-sponsored retirement plans. Economist Teresa Ghilarducci, of the New School for Social Research, and Hamilton James, executive vice chairman of the money-management giant Blackstone, favor Guaranteed Retirement Accounts. With those, any employer not offering a 401(k) would need to participate in, and contribute to, a government-sponsored retirement savings plan.

And one idea long floated by retirement security experts is attaching an Individual Retirement Account or 401(k) to each Social Security account.

Even if Congress approves a retirement commission, the risk is that its report will get shelved. That&a;rsquo;s what happened to the retirement system study launched in 1979 by President Carter. Its recommendations &a;mdash; including a mandatory universal private pension &a;mdash; were released in 1981.

We can&a;rsquo;t wait any longer.

Sunday, May 20, 2018

Americans Are Bad at Taking Vacation -- and It's Hurting Them Big Time

Paid time off is among the most coveted workplace benefits out there. Yet a large chunk of Americans who are eligible for paid vacation make the glaring mistake of not using it. A disturbing 21% of U.S. employees admit to having left vacation days on the table over the past year, according to new data from Kimble Applications. And that's a decision that could hurt them, as well as other employees, in the long run.

Why can't we give ourselves a break?

Some workers don't take vacation because they're not entitled to paid time off. But for others, it's a matter of job-related stress and demands. Specifically, 27% of workers say they have too many things going on at the office or too many pressing deadlines to take time away, while 13% skimp on vacation days because they worry they'll return to piles of work.

Man checking a mobile phone by a pool

IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.

Furthermore, while some employers go so far as to force workers to take vacation, others encourage workers not to take time off, either directly or indirectly. In fact, 19% of employees say they've felt pressured by their companies to avoid spending time out of the office. And more than 25% say that the mere act of submitting a time-off request makes them feel anxious.

Even those workers who do manage to take vacation don't get a true break from the grind. Nearly 50% of employees admit that they actively check in on work matters while away from the office, and almost 30% claim they're expected to be available for emergencies.

Clearly, this points to a dangerous trend. The fact of the matter is that workers need time away to recharge and tend to personal matters. If they don't get it, they risk burning out and growing less productive, not more. And while companies should play a role in encouraging and enabling employees to get that time away, it's something workers need to push for at the individual level.

Don't pass up that vacation time

So how can you, as an employee, manage to take all of your allotted vacation time without experiencing backlash? For one thing, be strategic in when you schedule your time off. Aim to get away during less busy periods at work so that you don't risk missing deadlines or falling behind on major projects. Along these lines, if possible, try not to take time off during the holidays because that's when your company likely will be most understaffed. If you request vacation time the same week when half your team will be gone, your manager is more apt to say no.

Additionally, find a couple of colleagues who can serve as backups while you're away, and carve out the time to bring them up to speed before you're set to be out of the office. This way, you won't have to worry about falling short on deadlines or coming back to as large a mountain of work.

But notice that I said "backups" -- as opposed to a single backup. You can't really expect one person to cover for you fully when you're used to working 40 hours a week or more, so divvy up that load among several colleagues. It may require a bit more time on your end to get different people in sync, but it'll make everyone's life easier (including your own) while you're away.

Finally, talk to your manager before heading out on vacation and set expectations with regard to your availability during that time. It might be perfectly reasonable for you to log into your email once each night to address priorities, but if you're looking to leave your phone and laptop at your hotel while you enjoy your days, make that clear from the start.

Similarly, set deadlines for completing the work that piles up while you're out. Maybe you normally would complete certain requests within 24 hours, but if you're coming back to 17 of them after a week away, you'll obviously need some time to get everything done. Establishing reasonable expectations for catching up on missed work can help you make the most of your time off without stressing about it.

You deserve a mental and physical break from the office, so if you're fortunate enough to have paid vacation time, don't give it up. Doing so not only hurts you, but sends the message to employers that workers don't really need that time off. And we all know very well that that's the furthest thing from the truth.